OceanLaw On-Line Paper
No. 18, March 2003
The Eritrea/Yemen Arbitration: Landmark
Progress in the Acquisition of Territorial Sovereignty and Equitable
Maritime Boundary Delimitation
Barbara Kwiatkowska
Professor of International Law
Deputy Director, Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea (NILOS)
Abstract
The Five-Member
Eritrea/Yemen Arbitral Tribunal - comprising Judges Sir Robert Jennings
(President), Stephen M. Schwebel, Rosalyn Higgins, Ahmed S. El-Kosheri and Keith
Highet - unanimously resolved in its two masterly Awards the disputed
territorial sovereignty over the Red Sea islands (Phase I - 1998) and the
delimitation of international maritime boundary (Phase II - 1999) in one of
strategically most sensitive regions of the world.
The article surveys
landmark progress marked by each of the Awards in the development of principles
and rules of international law in the respective subject matters of the Awards.
While due attention is paid to the consistency of the Awards with the preceding
decisions of the International Court of Justice and arbitral tribunals
concerning acquisition of territorial sovereignty and equitable maritime
delimitation, distinct features - such as rejection by the 1998 Award of the
existence of a principle of reversion of a newly independent state to the
ancient title to territory - are also examined. The analysis of the 1999 Award
focuses on the complex decision-making process which led the Arbitral Tribunal
to equitable delimitation of the Eritrea/Yemen international maritime boundary
by means of a single all-purpose boundary. The resultant line substantiates the
governing role of equidistance between the opposite states and its adjustment by
the factors pertaining to baselines, islands, reefs, low-tide elevations,
strategic navigational concerns and interests of the third states concerned. The
Tribunal also importantly reappraised the role of resource related factors and
the principle of proportionality. Fisheries factors formed part of resolution of
the territorial sovereignty in the 1998 Award, as further defined in the 1999
Award and as implemented through the subsequent cooperation of the parties. The
article takes account of the multiple impacts of both Eritrea/Yemen
Awards on the 2001 Qatar v. Bahrain (Merits) and the 2002 Cameroon v.
Nigeria; Equatorial Guinea Intervening (Merits) Judgments as well as on the
peaceful resolution of the Eritrea/Ethiopia Boundary dispute within the
United Nations framework in 2002-2003.
This
paper is based on earlier work, published at
www.rgl.ruu.nl/english/isep/paper.asp and
in (2001) 32 Ocean Development and International Law 1-25 and is updated
and revised as of March 2003.