| ||||||
|
RESOLUTION 1.9 INTERNATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES FOR 2002-2006 The Meeting of the Parties to the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic Area, Aware that resources for the implementation of the Agreement (information, research expertise and funds) are unequally distributed throughout the Agreement area, and that an effective implementation of the Agreement will require strong international co-operation; Aware that scientific research in the Agreement area is essential to identify the populations having the least favourable conservation status and to address the conservation priorities; Considering that Parties, particularly developing countries and countries with economies in transition, require a clear prioritisation of conservation and research activities in order to apply their limited resources most effectively, Further considering that bilateral and multilateral donors will be greatly assisted in their allocation of funds for international co-operation, by a clear prioritisation of needs, Recalling that Article IX.3. calls for voluntary contributions in order to increase the funds available for monitoring, research and training and projects relating to conservation; Recalling Resolution 1.7 establishing a Supplementary Conservation Fund; Recalling that Article IX.4. encourages Parties to provide technical and financial support on a bilateral or multilateral basis to assist Range States which are developing countries or countries with economies in transition to implement the provisions of the Agreement; 1. Notes the particular importance for the Agreement of focusing on known scientific gaps (both thematic and geographic), and of identifying remaining gaps; 2. Adopts the international implementation priorities for 2002-2006, as in annex I, without prejudice to the pursuance of existing conservation actions; 3. Urges Parties and specialised international Organisations to develop international co-operation projects for the implementation of the Agreement, in line with the priorities listed in annex I, and to keep the Agreement Secretariat fully informed of progress; 4. Recommends that the creation or extension of databases, for example under items 3, 11 and 16 of Annex of the present document, be co-ordinated to maximize synergies with existing databases such as the Global Register of Migratory Species (GROMS) of CMS and information held by the UNEP – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). 5. Further urges Parties, the Agreement Secretariat and specialised International Organisations to seek innovative mechanisms and partnerships in particular with fishermen and other relevant professionals, to enable implementation of the Conservation Plan and the priorities listed in annex I. This could include joint ventures, twinning arrangements, secondment and exchange programmes, corporate sector sponsorships and species adoption programmes; 6. Requests bilateral and multilateral donors to provide financial assistance to Range States for the implementation of the Agreement, by supporting implementation of its priorities using the financial mechanism of the Agreement; 7. Instructs the Agreement Secretariat to disseminate the international implementation priorities for 2002-2006, to co-ordinate closely with related Conventions and International Organizations, in particular CIESM and "ACCOBAMS' Partners", for their implementation, to seek appropriate donors, and, following the recommendations of the Sub-Regional Co-ordination Units and the Scientific Committee, to bring to each session of the Meeting of the Parties reports on progress with implementation and an updated list of priorities. 8. Calls on the Scientific Committee to further develop the actions needed to implement the priorities listed and described in Annex 1, fully bearing in mind all the Resolutions agreed on at this Meeting of the Parties. Annex 1 International Implementation Priorities for 2002-2006 prepared by The following list of 18 priority actions was prepared to assist Contracting Parties to implement priorities for international cooperation during the period 2002-2006. This list was generated by extracting from, and modifying, a broader list of activities, developed during a CIESM Workshop which was held in Monte Carlo in September 2001. With the intent of optimising effort among concurrent international organisations, some of the actions proposed here are inspired by, and partly coincide with, similar conservation actions proposed in the most recent Cetacean Action Plan of the World Conservation Union (R.R. Reeves, B.D. Smith, E. Crespo, G. Notarbartolo di Sciara. In press. Dolphins, whales, and porpoises: status, threats, and conservation action plan for cetaceans. IUCN, Gland). The order in which actions are listed in this document does not imply priority. Rather, actions are arranged following the order in which conservation measures are listed in the Conservation Plan (Annex 2 of the Agreement). For each action, references to the corresponding paragraphs of the Conservation Plan and to the budget item in Doc. MOP1/17 are presented to the left of the activity’s title. For each item the types of activity involved are listed, along with the projected timescale. An indicative budget is indicated as well, mostly for an initial two-year period, corresponding to the figures quoted in Doc.MOP1/17, and in some cases concerning the action’s first phase. Whenever possible, the budget for the completion of the action is also indicated. Detailed project proposals will be successively required, once their funding and implementation will be assured. International Implementation Priorities, 2002 – 2006 List of Actions 1. Development of criteria and provision of ad hoc support for the harmonisation of commercial whale watching regulations with science-based knowledge on the protection needs of the involved cetacean populations. 2. Investigation of competitive interactions between coastal dolphins and artisanal fisheries. 3. Creation of a cetacean bycatch database (first phase). 4. Development and implementation of pilot conservation and management actions in well-defined key areas containing critical habitat for populations belonging to priority species. 5. Workshop on methods for the evaluation of habitat degradation and its effect on cetacean populations. 6. Conservation plan for cetaceans in the Black Sea. 7. Conservation plan for short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in the Mediterranean Sea. 8. Conservation plan for common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Mediterranean Sea. 9. Basin-wide Mediterranean sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) survey. 10. Identification of Mediterranean sites of conservation importance for fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in addition to the Ligurian-Corsican-Provençal (CLP) basin, and assessment of the functional relationships of such sites to the LCP basin with respect to the species’ habitat needs. 11. Development of photo-identification databases and programmes encompassing the entire ACCOBAMS Area. 12. Establishment and implementation of a long-term training programme on cetacean research, monitoring and conservation/management techniques and procedures. 13. Development of an educational tool for the organisation of research projects and basic technical studies. 14. Creation of sub-regional directories of national authorities, research and rescue centers, scientists, governmental and non-governmental organisations concerned with the Agreement’s objectives. 15. Support to the implementation of national stranding networks, and their co-ordination into a wider regional network. 16. Development of a network of specialised bibliographic collections and databases. 17. Establishment of a system of tissue banks. 18. Establishment of a Task Force for special mortality
events.
As commercial whale watching operations develop in the Agreement area, it is anticipated, as well as desirable, that regulatory measures will be prepared and implemented by the concerned countries, to ensure that such development proceeds in a sustainable and respectful fashion. Although all whale watching regulations share a common matrix, which depends on the nature of this activity, it is important that regulations be framed within the specific ecological and biological context in which they apply. Cetacean populations may show varying degrees of susceptibility to disturbance depending on their species-specific behavioural traits, behavioural state, socio-ecological context, overall level of disturbance from other causes, degree of habituation, etc. Guidelines should be developed to assist countries in adapting regulations to the needs of the populations targeted by whale watching, and ad hoc scientific support should be provided to allow the development and implementation of adaptive whale watching management. In addition, to assist in this process, a centralised inventory of commercial whale watching operations in the Agreement area should be established and maintained. Activities: desk study, consultations, centralised inventory Possible synergies: 4 Duration: guidelines: 1 year; scientific support: ongoing. Indicative budget: guidelines and scientific support (2002): €
4,000
A workshop sponsored by Italy in Rome in May 2001 investigated and evaluated efforts by fishermen and others to deter dolphins from nets. It was concluded that although the problem of dolphin depredation has become a major issue in the eyes of Mediterranean fishermen, and therefore deserves to be addressed in a responsible manner by government agencies and conservation groups, there is a danger that the ad hoc and even experimental use of noise-making deterrence devices could have unintended adverse effects on other species, as well as prove ineffective for reducing fishery-dolphin conflicts. The workshop produced a series of recommendations for research and development, and concluded that high-intensity acoustic devices that are typically used to keep pinnipeds away from aquaculture facilities are inappropriate for use in alleviating conflicts between dolphins and fisheries in the Mediterranean. This project would consist in the implementation of the recommendations made by the Rome workshop. In particular, in addition to obtaining detailed quantitative information on the characteristics of common bottlenose and short-beaked common dolphin populations in the Mediterranean (see Actions 7 and 8), data should be collected on the spatial, seasonal, and operational features of small-scale coastal trammel and gillnet fisheries in the region. Identification of a small number of exemplary «problem areas» where overlap occurs (i.e., high dolphin densities matched with high levels of fishing activity) should be followed by rigorous site-specific pilot studies to characterise and quantify the costs of dolphin depredation. Where serious problems are found to exist, rigorous tests of potential solutions should be conducted after extensive consultations with fishermen as well as technical experts. It is important that due consideration be given to the real or potential adverse side effects of any mitigation approach. Non-acoustic means of reducing conflicts, such as changes in methods of gear deployment, the use of quieter engines, the introduction of compensation or insurance mechanisms and the development of parallel dolphin watching activities, all hold promise and deserve to be evaluated. Activities: field surveys in 2-3 pilot areas, desk study, fishermen interviews, research, consultations Possible synergies: 3, 4, 7, 8 Duration: 4 years Indicative budget: 2002-2004: € 48,000
Cetacean mortality through accidental capture and drowning in fishing gear – most notably, pelagic driftnets in the Mediterranean and bottom gillnets in the Black Sea - is considered a major conservation concern in the Agreement area. However, very little data exist on bycatch numbers and rates, on species and fishing gear involved, and on the geographical and seasonal variability of bycatch events. Such information is of fundamental importance, among other things, if bycatch rates are to be related to population sizes, thereby assessing whether mortality deriving from fishery activities is sustainable or not. The goal of this action is to facilitate the incorporation of reporting of cetacean bycatch incidents into fishery management practice throughout the Agreement Member States, and to encourage the use of independent observers aboard vessels to collect unbiased data. The project involves the establishment of a bycatch Task Force under the purview of the Agreement, which will coordinate efforts during an initial 3-year pilot phase in three experimental areas (ideally, one in a northern Mediterranean country, one in a southern Mediterranean country, and one in a Black Sea country). Procedures learned during this pilot phase may then be applied in the remaining portion of the Agreement area. The bycatch Task Force should: (a) work in close contact with the fishery management authorities of the selected countries; (b) provide technical support, data quality control, training, awareness building, advice and recommendations as needed; and (c) help in the creation of the first nucleus of a centralised bycatch database. Cooperation with the appropriate effort currently undertaken by the European Commission to monitor cetacean bycatch in European waters is strongly recommended. Activities: coordination, consultations, training, awareness programmes, database Possible synergies: 2, 4, 15 Duration: 3 years (first phase) Indicative budget: € 12,000
|