|
Short
title |
Brower v
Daley |
|
|
Parties |
Brower and ors |
|
|
v |
|
|
Daley, Secretary
of Commerce, and ors |
|
|
Forum |
US
District Court, Northern District of California |
|
|
Date |
12 April 2000 |
|
|
Reported |
93 F. Supp. 2d
1071 |
|
|
Summary |
Summary |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
This cases follows a decision of
the Secretary of Commerce to amend the dolphin-safe standard for
tuna so as to permit the import of tuna caught using purse
seines provided the fish were caught in compliance with the
Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program. The
decision of the Secretary of Commerce was based on an initial
finding (based on various research projects specifically
mandated by Congress) that there was insufficient evidence that
the use of chase and encirclement fishing techniques for tuna in
association with dolphins was having a “significant adverse
impact” on depleted dolphin populations in the Eastern Pacific
Ocean (EPO). The District Court set aside the Secretary's
initial finding, stating that it was not in accordance with the
law and was an abuse of discretion because
the Secretary failed to (1) obtain
and consider preliminary data from the
congressionally mandated stress studies
and (2) apply the proper legal standard to the available
scientific information.
|
|
| |
Bibliographic references |
|
| |
C. Hedley,
'Casenote:
One step back for international
cooperation; backwards or forwards for dolphins?'
(2000) 12 Journal of Environmental Law 361 [View
Text] |
|
|
|