|
Short
title |
Ajka
v AFMA |
|
|
Parties |
Ajka
Pty Ltd |
|
|
v |
|
|
Australian
Fisheries Management Authority |
|
|
Forum |
Federal
Court of Australia |
|
|
Date |
26
March 2003 |
|
|
Reported |
[2003]
FCA 248 |
|
|
IFLPR
casenote |
Summary |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
Ajka had applied to
the Australian
Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) for two
new fishing permits to fish for skipjack tuna within the area of
existing tuna fisheries. AFMA refused to issue new permits as it
considered that there was no justification for departing from the
‘limited entry policy’ which provided that no new permits be
issued in the tuna fisheries. Ajka appealed the decision
but the Federal Court of Australia
upheld the decision made by the Administrative
Appeals Tribunal (AAT) which had refused the company's
application.
|
|
|
|